November 18, 2005

 

check it out




the sporting word has officially been put into syndication. I bet you didn't know it was so popular!

You now can catch much of my Syracuse University sports rants on Syracuse.com at http://www.syracuse.com/weblogs/orangejuice/

enjoy!



 

better than advertised



Alright. I just got home from watching the SU-Texas Tech game, and I've spent the last hour thinking about Syracuse's impressive performance - dominating defense, a guard-led offense, McNamara's 9 assists...just an all-around great game for SU that resulted in an 81-46 whuppin. Now here I am, entertaining thoughts of how this team could be better than I anticipated - much more defensively sound than I gave them credit for - possibly better than a Sweet Sixteen team if they play all their games this way.

Then I look through today's mail, finding the latest Sports Illustrated on our kitchen counter. Front page headline? "Can Anyone Stop Duke? HERE COMES UCONN," with a shot of 7 Connecticut players charging at the camera lens as if they were going to war with their basketballs.

Fine. Connecticut's good this year. I concede the point, including the fact that Rudy Gay is just a better player than our man McNamara (who finished with 12 pts, 5 rebounds and only 1 turnover with those 9 assists). Yeah, the Huskies have a shot at taking the top spot from the uber-talented Blue Devils squad, if they can manage to keep the rest of their starting five out of jail. What I really wanted to know after looking at that cover, though, was, "But what do they think of the Orange?"

So I flip through the pages, eventually getting to the NCAA preview section. There's Duke with a six page article and their own battle portrait, of course, touting a top freshman class and plenty of experience to guarantee Coach K another Final Four. That's OK - unlike most other college basketball fans, I like Duke. I respect a program that has consistent success over many years, simply because they've done it in an era when superstars are quick to flee for the money and the only thing that keeps a program's hopes alive are its coaches. Duke is great, and I always root for them when Syracuse isn't on the court.

After the Duke feature comes the Texas feature, another UConn spread, and the obligatory Women's Hoops story, naming Tennessee as the top team. Whatever. Right now I only want to know what the top sports magazine in the country has to say about the Cuse this year. I keep flipping pages, running through the top 20, only to discover that SU is not included. In fact, Syracuse isn't even mentioned until SI gets to the 21-65 rankings, listing the Orange at #29.

Huh? Saaay whaaat? Since when is #17 Northern Iowa considered a contender while Syracuse is banished outside the top 25? And how did Texas Tech get ranked 24th with 7 freshmen on the team and virtually no previous tournament experience in the starting five? Apparently, SI is trying to make a point. I note that a writer by the name of Luke Winn is responsible for numbers 21-65, and resolve that I will find out how he is qualified to make such important evaluations. After Googling his name I discover that not only did he root for Vermont to upset SU last year (noting that Jim Boeheim is "grumpy" - do I smell a Newhouse reject?) but he also fell in love with Northern Iowa before the 2005 tournament (they lost to Wisconsin in the first round). Hmmmm.... a trend developing perhaps?

Anyway, Sports Illustrated didn't feel SU deserved much credit at the time of its publication - afterall, they've lost Hakim Warrick and Josh Pace, and who knows how well these current juniors can play, right? Besides, the 2-3 zone is overrated and everyone has learned that all they have to do is double-team McNamara in order to win the game. The team is obviously going to fail - they've only got one starting senior and everyone knows Boeheim's no Bobby Knight when it comes to building new teams and maintaining a program's status...

Mr. Winn didn't actually say all that, even if that's what I picture him thinking to himself while smirking and deviously rubbing his hands together, developing a plan to discredit all of Syracuse University and burn down the Carrier Dome... What he did say is that Roberts is "unproven" despite playing well over the summer and they only have 2 returning starters. I see his point, but I still think the Orange belong in the Top 20. He can rank them wherever he pleases, though - he's just wrong. The Orange even proved it on the same day his rankings were published. Ha!

Syracuse University absolutely smothered Texas Tech tonight. If there's ever a time for overzealous expectations and grandiose pronouncements of basketball excellence, tonight's the night. Sports Illustrated's 24th ranked Red Raiders got trounced by the supposed lowly Orange. They were smacked around on both ends of the court as if they were Manlius Pebble Hill and SU was Henninger. Syracuse began the game on a 17-2 run and never looked back - after it ended, Bob Knight said the game was over after the first five minutes, praising the Cuse defense as one of the best zones he's ever seen. Everything seemed to go well: McNamara hit the 3's they needed (3-7), Roberts played with strength under the glass (7 rebs) and the team shot well overall (51%, though only 32% from three). Eric Devendorf provided spark off the bench, going 3 for 6 (2-3 from long range) with 11 pts, and Darryl Watkins was more of an intimidating presence underneath than Craig Forth ever was (4-4, 8pts, 6 reb, 2 blk). The defense was the driving force behind the win, holding Tech to just 29% from the field. They just played a quality team-oriented ballgame - everyone who played scored, though no one had more than McNamara's 12. They played together, and it showed in the results. Even Louie McCroskey turned in a good (if sometimes sloppy) performance with 10pts and 6 rebounds in 20 minutes.

Now the focus switches to the finals and SI's 44th ranked Florida Gators, who upset Wake Forest, 77-72, in the first game of the evening. If Syracuse can play the same aggressive defense with some shooting and a strong transition game, Sports Illustrated and everyone else just may be forced to give a little more respect to this year's Orange.

November 17, 2005

 

pregame warmups

There's just under 3 hours 'til gametime and before I head to Taps with a few friends to watch the Orange play the Red Raiders I have some expectations I need to express before finding out just how good this team really is. At this point we're still able to look at SU and think of them as a Top 20, Sweet Sixteen sort of squad - not great, but better than most. We already know the basketball team won't go 1-10 this year, and we can look forward to some victory celebrations to offset what should only be a handful of mournful defeats. Syracuse has the athletes and the experience to be pretty good this year, and after tonight we'll be better able to predict the degree of excellence they could potentially achieve.

Five questions that we might be able to answer after this evening, but probably won't:


1. Is McCroskey the next Tony Bland?

I think I've somehow managed to overlook the similarities here: when Bland was a freshman, he looked like he had true potential to be one of the top players on the team throughout his career - he hustled, he could score and, like McCroskey, Boeheim seemed to like him. He liked Bland so much, actually, that he put him in the starting lineup in 1999, the beginning of his sophomore season. Tony started all 32 games that year - an accomplishment that usually means Jimmy B. thinks you have some real ability and a future on the team. As the season wore on, though, Tony Bland became less of a leader and more of a ghost - he just stopped playing all together. Boeheim let him keep his starting position, but gradually reduced his playing time while Bland's successor, DeShaun Williams, got to see more action (Williams actually played his best games as a backup, also managing to somehow keep his fist out of Preston Shumpert's eyesocket for an entire season). By the time the 2000 NCAA Tournamnet arrived, Bland was scoring 3.3 pts/game in only 13 minutes per contest. Basically, by the end of the season the Orangemen's starting shooting guard would play the opening 5 minutes of each half - and that was it. I was always curious as to why Boeheim kept him in the starting lineup - the coach maintained that Tony had earned the spot, but after the DeShaun-Preston power struggle that developed over the following 2 seasons I'm starting to think that Jimmy just didn't want to give Williams a motive to attack teammates. Bland was gone the following year, transferring to San Diego State and playing like Boeheim apparently knew he could. Will Louie also lose his playing time to the up and coming freshman? I'm thinking yes.




2. Will Terrence Roberts continue to score and rebound now that the opposition is stronger?

Roberts was great against Bethune-Cookman and Cornell, but still has yet to play against anyone taller or stronger than he is. He's currently shooting at 82% - something that he can't possibly maintain against stiffer competition. Although Tech is known more for their guardplay than their big men, they should be able to compete much more effectively with SU's post players. If Roberts can have a 15 pt/10 reb. night, I think SU will win the game.




3. Can Syracuse shoot?

They better, or they're in for a long season. So far this year they've relied on steady defense to win, as no one seems to be able to drain anything past 15 feet. This could be a product of the tournament's extended 3 point line, an experiment that most coaches have agreed is much more detrimental than helpful to their teams' early season development, as everyone but Cornell has been having problems shooting treys this week and last. SU needs McNamara, Nichols, and Devendorf to shoot well or the team will end up just as lost as they were against Cornell. If they can hit the outside shot, it'll make Roberts and Watkins more effective inside and they'll win more games as a result.



4. Who's better: Boeheim or Knight?

Who cares. This is only the 4th time they've met in the last 20 years and the first since the Maui Invitational in 1998. You can expect to see some excessive coverage on this question tonight, including one too many slow-motion shots of Keith Smart rearing back and suckerpunching me square in the gut. What kind of person does that to a 7 year-old? Is there any justice? I'd much rather watch replays of Sherm Douglas hiking a basketball 40 feet downcourt to start a fastbreak as #1 SU stomped Indiana to open the '87-'88 season.




5. Can SU win two tournaments in Madison Square Garden again?

They did last year...but that was last year. This time we might have to be content with just getting to play in one of the championship games. Texas Tech is going to be a tough matchup, but I do believe Syracuse will get to the final game - my guess is that it'll be against Billy Donovan and the Florida Gators, if only to create even more references to the '87 Final Four. Media heaven!



Enjoy the game - hopefully we'll see some solid defense, strong rebounding, a few G-Mac 3s, and a SportsCenter-worthy Devendorf crossover. If so, Cuse wins.


November 10, 2005

 

lookout for big red



I know I'm a day late in putting something together on the Orange-Big Red game last night, but I really needed some time to digest and accept what happened. After reviewing the contest a few times in my head and giving some thought to the various factors that contributed to SU's shaky performance, I've decided that it all boils down to one exchange between myself and my Dad while we sat in the stands, helpless to change what was unfolding before us. I said, "If they keep this up, they'll be losing a lot of games this year." His answer? "Yep. I think so too."

Unfortunately, we weren't talking about Cornell.

In case you missed it, Syracuse barely edged the Ivy League's perennial second-place finisher last night, 67-62. For a contest in which the winner was decided several months ago, when Jimmy B. and his fellow Coaches vs. Cancer Tournament (now the 2K Sports Tournament) organizers set the brackets, this game was much too close for comfort. Halfway through the second half, Cornell actually led the 2003 National Champions by 4 points and were outplaying the 16th ranked Orange on both ends of the court. SU looked lost on offense, often spending entire possessions endlessly tossing the ball around the 3-point arc, only to eventually chuck up one of the 18 jumpshots they missed from that distance. As a team they finished the game 1 for 19 from 3-point territory - the single good one coming from Demetrius Nichols, 20 seconds after tip-off for the team's first 3 points of the game. SU actually went more than 39 minutes without a 3 point shot last night, as Nichols eventually finished 1 for 7 and McNamara 0 for 10. It was the first time in 50 games that Gerry failed to hit a trey, and it wasn't pretty.

Prior to the game I had a discussion with the Dad of previous mention and my man Fast Eddie, who was also at the game. Fast Eddie and I were contending that McNamazing would find a spot on an NBA team next year, making the usual comparisons to John Paxson, Scott Skiles and Steve Kerr. My Dad, however, felt that yes, Gerry's great, but no, he isn't an NBA player. He told us that the days of the short, spot-up jumpshooter have passed in America, and we'd have to find a way to order European television if we want to see #3 play next year. Last night, though, Gerry proved father-knows-best to be incorrect. In fact, last night, Gerry McNamara played not as if he were a lowly NBA bench player, but an NBA MVP! G-Mac will play in the NBA, if only for the simple reason that he is able to do a dead-on Allen Iverson impersonation.

Both Iverson and McNamara played last night, helping their teams to victory. Since the statistics are readily available, let's do the comparison:

Iverson (Philly wins, 112-97): 25 pts, 8-21 FG (38%), 9-11 FT (82%), 3 reb, 7 assists, 4 turnovers in 38 minutes.

McNamara (Cuse wins, 67-62): 17 pts, 2-14 FG (14%), 13-14 FT (93%), 4 reb, 5 assists, 2 turnovers in 39 minutes.


Hell, give Gerry another 7 shots like Iverson, and I'm sure he could've come up with 25 points or so. Those are the kind of stats that make stars!

That 2 for 14 stat is correct, by the way, though it will hopefully be the last time we have to read something that horrid from the team's best shooter. The fact is that McNamara just had a terribly off night. He said after the game that his shots felt good, only they weren't dropping, and from what I could see, he was right. Many of the ten 3's he took rattled around the rim before spinning out, usually shots he manages to sink. The ball just wasn't falling the way it should have for the Orange, which allowed Cornell to stay in the game (they were right on, dropping 11 threes at 48%). During one 10 minute span towards the end of the second half, Syracuse looked confused on their own court. They knew that the shots weren't falling, and the whole team seemed unsure of how to act against Cornell's defense, who had dropped into a zone because they also knew that SU wasn't able to hit anything at that point. During this time, it looked like the upcoming season would be defined by the loss of Hakim Warrick, who was able to counter any zone defenses in the past by literally jumping over double teams to score whenever Gerry got cold.

Eventually, though, Boeheim made a great move and substituted Rookie of the Year Eric Devendorf into the game for Future Sixth Man of the Year Louie McCroskey. Devendorf looked unsure at first, hesitating when he got the ball and seeming ill-prepared to shoot. After a few trips up and down the floor, though, the freshman absolutely took over the game and delivered the win. Terrence Roberts may have gotten the MVP of the regional (which he deserved, considering his 19pts and career-high 14 rebounds vs Cornell), but Devendorf was the reason for last night's comeback victory. On three of four consecutive plays, Devendorf got the ball on the perimeter and drove to the basket, leaving 3 Cornell players in his wake each time. He single-handedly busted the Big Red zone, getting inside with his dribble and making difficult lay-ins to create and expand the Syracuse lead. He scored 6 points on the night - all of them with under 5:30 remaining, and all of them at crucial moments when the team was faltering elsewhere. Though he looked unsure of himself at first, he played with confidence just in time to send the crowd home without any embarassment.

If Syracuse continues to play this way, though, my Dad and I will be right to say they'll lose more often than usual. The defense is solid and the young players are stellar, but these Orangemen need to shoot to win. The team is built to play around McNamara, and he is going to have to shoot better than Mr. Iverson to rack up the wins. Hopefully, by the time next Thursday arrives his shot will feel good and look good, or else they'll be leaving the Garden without a second MVP trophy for Terrence.


November 03, 2005

 

it's mail time!



My Uncle Bud requested that I check in occasionally and post what my readers have to say about the various topics under discussion around here. I found this to be a great idea, as after just one month I realized I could fill an entire entry with some quality Q&A. Believe it or not, you're not the only one reading this blog while passing time during your lunchbreak, or every Tuesday night anxiously awaiting the new episode of "The Real World: Austin." Much like Nehemiah and Wes' groupie drawer, the Sporting Word fanbase grows exponentially on a nightly basis. If there's a Dizzy Rooster of online sports blogging, this page is it.


As always, with fame comes scrutiny - here are your thoughts, and my answers:





"Are you trying to tell me that if you were to create a team, from scratch, you're first move would be to pick up a playoff closer?"

- justin, Somerville, MA


I was actually re-thinking what I wrote about The Great Mariano and Brad Lidge while driving in the car today, and decided that I had to re-phrase what I wrote. Then my readers, as astute as they are, gave me this opportunity to correct my error. Instead of writing "there may be nothing more important in the modern era," I should have been more specific to the annual Fall Classic event itself. As such, I should have written, "There may be nothing more important to winning a World Series than having a top playoff closer."

If you look at the Yankees' World Series wins, the most consistent performer was always Rivera. Jeter, O'Neill, Brosius, Williams, and all the starting pitchers were generally great as well, but it was The Great Marian
o who put it all together and shut the door every time when they needed him to. A great World Series team needs to have that guy at the end of the game that can squash all emerging hopes once the starter is gassed and the team leading the game seems at its weakest. With the recent Yankee dynasty, though, they won championships because by the time the starting pitching was in the clubhouse the pitching got better. Nobody on the Padres, Braves, or Mets was looking to the 8th and 9th innings to make a comeback because it simply never happened. Also, when Mariano failed, the team failed - just look at 2001 against the Diamondbacks and, more notably, the 2004 ALCS. So, to answer the question - no, I wouldn't build a team from scratch by picking a closer first. I'd start with Kelly Leak, just like anyone else.





"Thank you for posting such a detailed account of the game - until we get our ESPN full court lined up (and the games are broadcast) it's nice to have information about the game. Is Terrence really injured? There's no reference to that on SU's page. . ."

- patricia, Downers Grove, IL




Hey, anything I can do to help Orange fans across the country, especially if I'm exposing a secret within the Athletics program! I'm surprised the Saint Rose game wasn't televised in Illinois, though - I figured the Fighting Illini could have shown some of the Devendorf footage to their freshman class to demonstrate how real recruits are able to perform. Hell, they could use it for the seniors, too, if they want... Devendorf, by the way, had 16 points in 23 minutes tonight in the exhibition against LeMoyne College, hitting 2 of 4 treys to give Gerry some help beyond the arc (they won, 94-54, with D. Nichols dropping 23 pts as well).

Yes, Terrence is really injured. He played with a brace tonight, but only for 16 minutes - just long enough to foul out of the game. I wasn't at the Dome tonight, but according to my sources he was fairly mobile even though he played with a bit of a limp at times. That's OK, though - it was actually just T-Rob gettin' gangsta.








"Sounds depressing down there. I guess Syracuse can do that to ya sometimes with all the snow and crappy football. Well things in Placid arent any better, its 35 right now and the wind is blowing at 95 mph giving a windchill of ~ -200. Oh yea, and its October."

- duncan, Lake Placid, NY



Yep. The football team is a crappy 1-7, and currently #6 in ESPN.com's Bottom 10 worst teams in all of Division I football. There's something to be proud of, right? Oh well. In weather like that you shouldn't be worrying about bad football, anyway. Shouldn't 95 mph winds qualify for some kind of FEMA help?




"I was at the Rutgers game and it was probably the ugliest thing I've ever seen in person. For some reason though, I don't feel nearly as bitter and angry as in recent years. It could be Gross's propaganda from the beginning of the season going to my head; it could be that I like Robinson that much; it could be that I have a renewed faith in God and all things unexplainable. I think I may just be numb with disappointment."

- chris, Syracuse, NY


It is definitely strange that the team is 1-7, a feat of feebleness that was never even approached by ex-coach Pasqualoni, and yet they're getting a free pass on this season (and it looks like next year will be included). It seems the community has just accepted that SU has a bad football team, and is willing to wait a few years to see if Coach Robinson and Athletic Director Gross can turn it around. The reason for this is that they have already convinced us that they will do it: both of them are brimming with energy, confident in "the Syracuse University brand" and are genuinely convinced that they will succeed in their efforts to put SU back in the Top 10. With Pasqualoni, there was no future. We knew he wouldn't take the program anywhere and we were stuck just waiting for him to quit or eventually get stoned on the quad. Once Gross took the initiative to fire and hire, we finally had something to look forward to again. That's what's refreshing about this particular 1-7 season - some hope for a new direction and the improvement that will eventually come with it. We'll even wait 3 or 4 years to get there.


and finally,



"dave siock is a saint."

- turner, boston, MA


Yes, Mr. Siock was an incredible force for the Orangemen in the early 1990's. I will never forget that time he was playing defense in the lane and made an incredible move to stop an opposing guard from getting to the hoop...6 seconds after the ball had dropped through the net. That was pretty good for him, though - Siock usually spent the entire game standing in the halfcourt circle with a mirror and comb, perfecting the part in his hair.

That big head was pretty perfect, though - it was even good enough to get him a spot on HoopScoop Online's 15th team All-America in 1988. Is that how they did it in the 80's? Why stop at 3rd team when you can go all the way to 30? If I had known that, I would've played varsity in '88 - surely I could've made at least the 25th team.





November 01, 2005

 

it's just an exhibition, coach!






The Syracuse Orange opened the 2005-06 basketball season with an exhibition against Division II Saint Rose. The unofficial line on the unofficial game gave SU a 30 point edge. Syracuse managed to win by a bit less, 86-73, despite some sloppy play and Jim Boeheim being ejected for the first time in his career as a Hall of Fame head coach.

Yes, you read it right - Jim Boeheim was ejected from an exhibition.


This is how it went down: the referees for the game treated the contest as it was on paper: a game that didn't really matter. On several occasions during the first half, both Saint Rose and Syracuse got away with blatant hacks that were visible to each of the 6,650 people in attendance. The refs would make a call here and there, but it seemed like they were just waiting for the whole thing to be over so they could collect their paychecks and go home. Apparently, this kind of performance from those in charge of the players' well-being was a bit irksome to Boeheim. After a no-call during a play in which a Josh Wright lay-up was broken up by a whack to the forearm (accompanied by a audible slapping noise) the SU coach decided he was going to voice his opinion to referee Pat Driscoll. It was clear that Driscoll wanted nothing of the coach's complaints during an exhibition match in which he was leading by nearly 20 points, and he gave Boeheim a technical foul for his words from the bench. The foul only made the head coach more upset, though, and he refused to relent in his criticism. After the second foul shot was made, referee Mike Kitts gave Boeheim a second technical, resulting in ejection. Boeheim left the court to a standing ovation, which was then followed by continuous booing until the refs left for halftime.

Here's what I think happened: Boeheim, after watching the referees make their series of no-calls throughout the first half, became frustrated with their lack of effort in a game he believed they weren't taking seriously. Then, once Terrence Roberts was benched due to a knee injury, Boeheim decided that the referees' ambivalence would not only affect the outcome of the game, but possibly his players' health as well. The coach made his feelings known after the obvious no-call that should have given tw
o free throws to Wright, only to be given the technical foul. Upon arguing his case further, one of the refs tried to remind Boeheim that the game was "only an exhibition" and he shouldn't get bent out of shape over something that doesn't count anyway. Somehow, I think an exchange like that just might prompt a never-ejected coach to use a few extra words not usually recommended by the NCAA. Result? Coach banished, referees win.

Otherwise, the game was fairly uneventful. The play on the court was out of synch at times, which is to be expected during a game in which the coaches used 87 different 5 man combinations in order to discover if any of the players mesh well together. The team shot 44% and committed 20 turnovers, though Boeheim contends that the scorekeeper was being nice to the freshmen and not including all of them in the final total. They also only outrebounded the Golden Knights 45-41, a small margin when playing against a team whose tallest player had to look up to see Darryl Watkins' Adam's apple. The Orange generally looked like they need more time to learn what kind of a team they are going to be this year. At no point during the game were there 5 players on the floor who had all played together simultaneously last year. Even while running in the open court - well ahead of any Golden Knight - they didn't seem to know where their teammates were located. Several opportunities were missed because of passes that were thrown offline or bounced when they should have been lobbed. Of course, by the end of the season these kinds of misunderstandings will be sorted out as players learn more about each others' tendencies.


Really, the point of the game for me was to see if Eric Devendorf can really play, if Gerry can lead with efficiency, if Roberts is going to step up and whether or not Watkins' new haircut will help him in the intimidation department. Boeheim used the assumed veteran starters for the game: McNamara, Louie McCroskey, Demetrius Nichols, Roberts, and Watkins. Those five lasted together for about 5 minutes until Wright and Devendorf were brought in to see which one will be suitable enough to replace McCroskey in the lineup, as one inevitably will do so by the end of the month. Both played well - they have different styles, but they proved themselves early on. Within about 25 seconds of stepping onto an NCAA court in front of a crowd of fans for the first time, Eric Devendorf drained a 3 pointer as if he had been doing it for 3 years, then he hustled back down the floor to get into defensive position. He struggled at times in traffic on defense, as he ended the game with 4 personal fouls, but overall the game was a good start to his efforts to become freshman of the year: 7 points, 3 rebounds. Josh Wright played with poise throughout the evening, showing his speed at the appropriate times and passing with flair, collecting 6 assists. On one occasion, Wright scooped up a loose ball near the top of the key, wrapped it around his waist from right to left, and held it with his right hand behind his back for McNamara to take an open 3, which would have properly accentuated the play had he made it. Both of the young guards looked smooth in transition, while McCroskey tended to lose control and tried to do too much when he had the ball in his hands. Louie finished with 9 pts. and 7 rebounds, but just didn't seem to be as active in the game as his younger counterparts.


McNamazing had a very easy 29 points in 33 minutes to lead all scorers, hitting all 14 of his free throws and picking up 6 assists to go with 5 steals and 2 blocks (yes - that's how short St. Rose is). He seemed in control of the team at all times while on the floor, and didn't even have to bring his best game. After tonight I started letting thoughts of Big East Player of the Year scamper through my head. I quickly squashed them, not wanting to be disappointed in the end. Darryl Watkins was dominating on defense, as he should have been, blocking 9 shots and scoring 10 points on the other end (when was the last time we expected at least 10 points each night from the center postion? It is going to be so great to finally know that the biggest guy on the court can actually score more than twice, not to mention take care of the jump balls. I may never get over the fact that we had a 7 foot, 96 pound screen setter with alligator arms starting in the post for 4 full years....what the heck was that, anyway? I am definitely guilty of defending Craig Forth on several occasions from 2001 to 2005, but I now believe I had to be fairly intoxicated while doing it.)





The surprise of the night to me, though, came in the form of Demetrius Nichols. DeNick was nasty on both ends of the floor. He finished as the team's second best player, putting up 13 points and leading with 8 rebounds. He played the old Hakim role in breaking the press throughout the game, and he seemed to be involved in more plays than he wasn't. I was truly impressed by Mr. Nichols this evening. By the second half, he even had me wondering if I was wrong to brand him as a non-starter next year. I'm sure this type of performance can't last - he's bound to start tossing up blindfolded 3's by December - but at least he had one (unofficial) game to look like he belongs in his position.

You may have noticied that I mentioned a Terrence Roberts knee injury earlier in this post. You may also have noticied that I don't really want to discuss the implications of said injury.

Instead, we'll just assume that he was acting in solidarity with his coach by protesting the game and sitting on the bench with a feigned grimace on his face. Right now he's showing everyone on the team his acting chops, laughing while he rewinds and replays the film footage in which he saves a ball from going out of bounds and lands a bit funny on that right leg...


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?